The exchange rate expresses the national currency's quotation in respect to foreign ones. For example, if one US dollar is worth 10 000 Japanese Yen, then the exchange rate of dollar is 10 000 Yen. If something costs 30 000 Yen, it automatically costs 3 US dollars as a matter of accountancy. Going on with fictious numbers, a Japan GDP of 8 million Yen would then be worth 800 Dollars.
Thus, the exchange rate is a conversion factor, a multiplier or a ratio, depending on the direction of conversion.
In a slightly different perspective, the exchange rate is a price. If the exchange rate can freely move, the exchange rate may turn out to be the fastest moving price in the economy, bringing together all the foreign goods with it.
It is customary to distinguish nominal exchange rates from real exchange rates. Nominal exchange rates are established on currency financial markets called "forex markets", which are similar to stock exchange markets. Rates are usually established in continuous quotation, with newspaper reporting daily quotation (as average or finishing quotation in the trade day on a specific market). Central bank may also fix the nominal exchange rate.
Real exchange rates are nominal rate corrected somehow by inflation measures. For instance, if a country A has an inflation rate of 10%, country B an inflation of 5%, and no changes in the nominal exchange rate took place, then country A has now a currency whose real value is 10%-5%=5% higher than before . In fact, higher prices mean an appreciation of the real exchange rate, other things equal.
Another classification of exchange rates is based on the number of currencies taken into account. Bilateral exchange rates clearly relate to two countries' currencies. They are usually the results of matching of demand and supply on financial markets or in banking transaction. In this latter case, the central bank acts usually as one of the sides of the relationship.
Other bilateral exchange rates may be simply computed from triangular relationships: if the exchange rate dollar/yen is 10 000 and the dollar/Angolan kwanza is 100 000 then, as a matter of computation, one yen is worth 10 kwanza. No direct yen/kwanza transaction needs to take place. If, instead,a financial market exists for yen to be exchanged with kwanza, the expectation is that actions by speculators (arbitrage among markets) will bring the parity of 10 kwanza per yen as an effect.
Multilateral exchange rates are computed in order to judge the general dynamics of a country's currency toward the rest of the world. One takes a basket of different currencies, select a (more or less) meaningful set of relative weights, then computes the "effective" exchange rate of that country's currency.
For instance, having a basket made up of 40% US dollars and 60% German marks, a currency that suffered from a value loss of 10% in respect to dollar and 40% to mark will be said having faced an "effective" loss of 10%x0.6 + 40%x0.4 = 22%.
Some countries impose the existence of more than one exchange rate, depending on the type and the subjects of the transaction. Multiple exchange rates then exist, usually referring to commercial vs. public transactions or consumption and investment imports. This situation requires always some degree of capital controls.
In many countries, beside the official exchange rate, the black market offers foreign currency at another, usually much higher, rate.
When the exchange rate can freely move, assuming any value that private demand and supply jointly establish, "freely floating exchange rate" will be the name of currency institutional regime. Equivalently, it is called "flexible" exchange rate as well.
If the central bank timely and significantly intervenes on the currency market, a "managed floating exchange rate regime" takes place. The central bank intervention can have an explicit target, for example in term of a band of currency acceptable values.
In "freely" and "managed" floating regimes, a loss in currency value is conventionally called a "depreciation", whereas an increase of currency's international value will be called "appreciation". If the dollar rise from 10 000 yen to 12 000 yen, then it has shown an appreciation of 20%. Symmetrically, the yen has undergone an 8.3% depreciation.
But central banks can also declare a fixed exchange rate, offering to supply or buy any quantity of domestic or foreign currencies at that rate. In this case, one talks of a "fixed exchange rate".
Under this regime, a loss of value, usually forced by market or a purposeful policy action, is called a "devaluation", whereas an increase of international value is a "revaluation".
The most stabile fixed exchange regimes are backed by an international agreement on respective currency values, often with a formal obligation of loans among central banks in case of necessity.
A "currency crisis" is a rupture of fixed exchange rates with an unwilling devaluation or even the end of that regime in favour of a floating exchange rate. It can dominate the attention of the public, policymakers and entrepreneurs, both in advance and after. For instance, people expecting a crisis can borrow inside the country, convert in a foreign currency, lend that money (e.g. by purchasing bonds). When the crisis comes, they sell the bonds, convert to the national currency, pay back their loans, and gain a hefty profit.
An extreme national engagement to fixed exchange rates is the transformation of the central bank in a mere "currency board" with no autonomous influence on monetary stock. The bank will automatically print or lend money depending on corresponding foreign currency reserves. Thus, exports, imports and capital inflows (e.g. FDI) will largely determine the monetary policy.
Monetary unions phase out the national currencies in favour of one (new or existing). Some further countries can target to join the union and put in place economic and financial policies to that aim, especially if there are explicit conditions for entering into that monetary area. Exiting a monetary union can provoke with large devaluation of the new national currency. Depending on trade elasticities, on foreign debt of the country, on how the exit is managed and on the overall institutional conditions, this can lead to massive internal poverty or a large export led-growth.
Fixed exchange rates are chosen by central banks and they may turn out to be more or less accepted by financial markets.
Changes in floating rates or pressures on fixed rates will derive, as for other financial assets, from three broad categories of determinants:
i) variables on
the "real" side of the economy;
Let's see them separately for the case of the exchange rate.
A rising trade surplus will increase the demand for country's currency by foreigners, so that there should be a pressure for appreciation. A trade deficit should weaken the currency.
Were exports and imports largely determined by price competitiveness and were the exchange rate very reacting to trade unbalances, then any deficit would imply depreciation, followed by booming exports and falling imports. Thus, the initial deficit would be quickly reversed. Net trade balance would almost always be zero.
This is hardly the case in contemporary world economy. Trade unbalances are quite persistent, as you can verify with these real world data. Additionally, not so seldom, exchange rates go in the opposite direction than one would infer from trade balance only.
2. An even more radical form of real determination of exchange rate is offered by the "one price law", according to which any good has the same price worldwide, after taken into account nominal exchange rates. If a hamburger costs 3 US dollars in the United States and 30 000 yen in Japan, then the exchange rate must be 10 000 yen per dollar. The forex market would passively adjust to permit the functioning of the "one price law".
But in order to equalise the price of several goods, more than one exchange rate may turn out to be "necessary". Moreover the "one price law" seems to suffer from too many exceptions to be accepted as the fundamental determinant of exchange rates.
Large, persistent and systematic violations of Purchasing Power Parity are connected to price-to-market decisions of firms in this paper of September 2007.
Monetary and financial variables in cross-linked markets
1. Interest rates on Treasury bonds should influence the decision of foreigners to purchase currency in order to buy them. In this case, higher interest rates attract capital from abroad and the currency should appreciate. Decisive would be the difference between domestic and foreign interest rates, thus a reduction in interest rates abroad would have the same effects.
Similarly other fixed-interest financial instruments could be objects of the same dynamics. Accordingly, an increase of domestic interest rates by the central bank is usually considered a way to "defend" the currency.
Nonetheless, it may happen that foreigners rather buy shares instead of Treasury bonds. If this were the strongest component of currency demand, then an increase of interest rate may even provoke the opposite results, since an increase of interest rate quite often depresses the stock market, favouring a tide of share sales by foreigners.
In the same "reversed" direction foreign direct investments would work: arestrictive monetary policy usually depresses the growth perspective of the economy. If FDI are mainly attracted by sales perspectives and they constitute a large component of capital flows, then FDI inflow might stop and the currency weaken.
Needless to say, those conditions are quite restrictive and not so usually met.
A matter of discussion would be whether the relevant interest rate is the nominal or the real one (which, in contrast with the former, keeps into account inflation). Usually foreign investors do not purchase bread, clothes, and the other items included in the bundle used to compute price level and its dynamics: they do not buy anything real in the target economy. So nominal rates are more likely to be taken into account.
As a temporary conclusion, interest rates should have an important impact on exchange rate but one has to be careful to check additional conditions.
2. Inflation rate is often considered as a determinant of the exchange rate as well. A high inflation should be accompanied by depreciation. The more so if other countries enjoy lower inflation rates, since it should be the difference between domestic and foreign inflation rates to determine the direction and the scale of exchange rate movements.
All this would be implied by a weak version of "one price law" stating that price dynamics of a good are the same worldwide, after taking into account nominal exchange rates. Thus, here not absolute level but just the percentage differences in price are requested to be equalised .
If an hamburger costs in Japan 5% more than a year ago, while in USA it costs 8% more, then the dollar should have been depreciated this year by about 8-5=3%.
But in order to equalise the price dynamics of different goods, more than one exchange rate change may turn out to be "necessary".
In reference to the overall price level of the economy, if exchange rates would move exactly counterbalancing inflation dynamics, then real exchange rates should be constant. On the contrary, this is not true as a strict universal rule.
Still, even if this weak version of the "law" does not always hold, high inflation usually give rise to depreciation, whose exact dimension need not match the inflation itself or its difference with foreign inflation rates.
3. The balance of payments can highlight pressures for devaluation or revaluation, reflected in large and systematic trend of foreign currency reserves at the central bank. In particular, large inflows, due for instance to a rise in the world price of main export items, tend to raise the exchange rate. Conversely, a collapse in the trust of government to manage the economic conditions might provoke a flight of capital, the exhaustion of foreign currency reserves and force devaluation / depreciation.
Autonomous dynamics on the forex market
Past and expected values of the exchange rate itself may impact on current values of it. The activities of forex specialists and investors may turn out to be extremely relevant to the determination of market exchange rate also thanks to their complex interaction with central banks. Sophisticated financial instruments like futures on exchange rates may play an important role. Imitation and positive feedbacks give rise to herd behaviour and financial fashions.
Fears and confidence in a currency are heterogeneosly distributed across agents, with special events (as unexpected news) realigning them and generating large movement in the exchange rate.
For a full-text free book on artificial forex market based on empirical field research see here.
Levels and fluctuations in the exchange rate exert a powerful impact on exports, imports and the trade balance. A high and rising exchange rate tends to depress exports, to boost import and to deteriorate the trade balance, as far as these variables respond to price stimuli. Consumers find foreign goods cheaper so the consumption composition will change. Similarly, firms will reduce their costs by purchasing intermediate goods abroad.
In extreme cases, local firms producing for the domestic market might go bankrupt. If the reason of appreciation was a soaring world price of main exports (e.g. energy carriers, like oil for many oil producing countries), the composition of the industrial texture would be starkly simplified and concentrated to those exports. This is at odds and works in the opposite direction of the diversification of the economy that is often the stated goal of public strategies in countries depending on too few productions (high export concentration).
A devaluation or depreciation should work in the opposite direction, improving the trade balance thanks to soaring exports and falling imports.
If, however, imports have an elasticity to price less than 1, their values in local currency will grow instead of falling. Moreover, if the state, the citizens and / or the enterprises have a debt denominated in a foreign currency, their principal and the interests to be paid soar because of the devaluation. They usually squeeze other expenditures and launch a recessionary impulse throughout the economy.
Previous investors in real estate and other assets would be hurt by devaluation, so the perspective of such a dynamics makes investors cautious and might sink FDI.
External debt denominated in foreign currency can, if large enough, provide considerable effects on the positive or negative impact of fluctuation. A devaluation with a large external debt provokes a larger outflows of interest payments (expressed in local currency), possibly squeezing the economy and the public budget, with recessionary effects.
For industries where production can be flexibly exported, devaluation offers important opportunities for growth and profitability. Conversely, industries selling exclusively on the domestic market (e.g. the building industry) may see their costs rising while purchasing power of their clients declines or remains at the same level, which erodes their profits and can even lead to bankruptcies. In other words, devaluation polarises the economy across industries.
Hosting different industries, regions usually exhibit a differentiated degree of international openness: exchange rate fluctuations will have an uneven impact on them.
Similarly, the number of job places and the working conditions may be influenced by the degree of international competition and exchange rates levels.
Exchange rate influences also the external purchasing power of residents abroad, for example in term of purchasing real estate and other assets (e.g. firm equity as a foreign direct investment), so by different channels, also the balance of payments.
Exchange rate devaluation (or depreciation) gives rise to inflationary pressures: imported good become more expensive both to the direct consumer and to domestic producer using them for further processing. In reaction to inflation (actual and feared), the central bank can rise the interest rates, thus sending a recessionary impulse. Similiarly, a package of fiscal austerity (expenditure cuts and selective tax increase), freezing wages and privatising loss-generating public assets is sometimes imposed after the currency crisis.
Currency crisis have a sweeping impact on income distribution. The few rich able to borrow (because they have collateral and the banks trust them) will get richer and the people purchasing imported goods facing inflation and reduction of real incomes.
Symmetrically, the central bank may use a fixed exchange rate as a nominal anchor for the economy to keep inflation under control, compelling domestic producer to face tougher competition if they were to decide to increase prices or accept to pay higher wages.
Were adjustment perfect, as rational expectations models would normally posits, inflation would immediately go to zero and there would be no effect on the real economy. Instead, real-world experiences show that even when successful in taming inflation (which is not always the case) the nominal anchor leadd to appreciation in real tirms (as the remaining inflation is not compensated by devaluation), which over the years can provoke structural trade deficit and loss of competitiveness (together with foreing debt with countries having a lower nominal interest rate). This conditions is usually unsustainable in the long run.
For a small economy, joining a monetary union makes the exchange rate to fluctuate according to fundamentals and market pressures referring to a much larger area, erratically going in directions that are (or are not) coherent with positive macroeconomic developments.
For statistics purposes, international comparisons of current values converted to a common currency are "distorted" by wide exchange rate fluctuations.
Some geographical monetary areas have enjoyed long periods of stable exchange rate, with moments of consensual realignment after divergence in inflation rates. Many countries strive to keep their currency at a fixed level toward the dollar, the Euro (earlier the German mark) or a basket with multiple currencies.
Still, most currency progressively devaluate, especially those issued by periphery countries. The US dollar has extremely wide fluctuations with years of "weak" and "strong" dollar.
Too many elements are at work for the exchange rate to exhibit a clearly-defined business cycle behaviour. To the extent that the exchange rate is determined by the trade balance, the exchange rate is counter-cyclical as the latter. At peaks, the trade deficit would depress the exchange rate, forcing it to depreciate.
If it is rather the interest rate that turns out to the main driver of the exchange rate, a possible pro-cyclicity of the interest rate would imply a pro-cyclical exchange rate.
In this scenario, recovery and boom are accompanied by rising interest rates and exchange rates. At peaks, we would see very strong currency. Together with domestic demand pressures, this would be the source of a high trade deficit.
If autonomous dynamics in the forex market are the main determinants of the exchange rate, then intense micro-fluctuations and long term tides would ride the exchange rate, possibly with central bank significant interventions.
Total exports, imports, trade balances for 181 countries - a time-series - Absolute values, shares in world market, rankings
A simulation model of an exporter firm - to play and understand how the exchange rate impacts on exports or whether is it easier for international business activities to work with fixed exchange rate or floating exchange rate
 To be precise, the required operation is not a subtraction but a ratio:
This means that the exact appreciation was 4.76%.
Please be patient - it may take long but it's worth downloading!