|
|||
|
Contents |
||
|
|
||
|
Significance Investment
plays six macroeconomic roles: Composition Investment is just new capital accumulation in business (both private and state-owned). Household by convention
do not invest, even if it does exist a capital accumulation in cars, computers,
electric appliances, etc. Public
expenditure is partly devoted to roads, railways, infrastructure,
buildings (as for schools, hospitals,
). All this is clearly capital
accumulation whose utility will last over time. Still, it is quite a common
practice for investment in public sector being considered zero by convention. 1.
inventories stock of finished goods, semi-manufactured goods, and
raw materials in commercial premises, storehouses and producers' plants; In today's world, investment in immaterial assets is getting more and more important, as with the case of expenditure in Research & Development, human capital, software and other areas. Financial investments in shares, obligations and other financial instruments are not considered as "investment" in a macroeconomic sense nor in national accountancy. The same is true for real estate exchanges of used buildings (both residential and non-residential). When considering the issue of the creation and diffusion of innovation through investment, a crucial distinction should be made between complementary investments and competitive investments. Determinants Benefits relate to the effects of investment in terms of increased value added, reduced costs, larger production, higher competitiveness. Hence, profits are expected to be higher, too. The value over time of these benefits (and profits in particular) are compared to the investment costs. In many decision processes, the value over time of benefits will be discounted through a subjective interest rate to keep into account time distance and uncertainty. In others, the decision will be based on more strategic and vital arguments. A new vision of the competitive environment and of the global trends can bring to invest in surprising directions. Funds
for investment can be obtained thanks to the following items: 1.
self-financing, in turn due to: 2.
loans from banks and other financial institutions: 3. capital market finance, through the emission of obligations as well as through the issue of shares in the stock market (primary market). The following price fluctuation do not directly have any impact on financing the firm. But it is true that further new emissions of shares often require positively-oriented capital markets. 4.
seed money and expansion capital for new firms provided by venture capitalists
and private equity funds; 5. public funds and incentives for investment from international, national, regional, local institutions. However, the empirical evidence of microdata shows that investment - at micro level - is infrequent and lumpy. There are periods in which firms decide not to invest and periods of large investment episodes. For better understand the issues at stake see this paper. Investment expenditure is a bet on future. If the bet is lost, the product does not find a remunerative market and much of the investment expenditure turns out to be a sunk cost that cannot be recovered. In the extreme case, investment is irreversible. Coupled with true uncertainty, irreversibility becomes a fairly important determinant of investment levels across industries, as this paper points out. In the IS-LM
model, interest rates are considered the unique determinant
of investment. In fact, interest rates play three distinct functions: 1.
they influence the discounted value of net benefits over time; In all three function, a higher interest should trigger a lower investment, since the present value of benefits will be lower, finance costs higher and economic perspectives worse. Still, there exists
investments that are not based on interest rates considerations. For instance,
firms have usually a very restricted number of investment projects, carrying
them out when profitability is well above zero. A small change
in interest rate would have simply no impact
on each investment decision, thus on aggregate level as well. By contrast, the effect of large interest rate changes may be highly asymmetric: a strong increase of interest rate can indeed provoke a fall in investment dynamics whereas a similar decrease may fail to induce investment, if real perspective benefits are lacking. Other determinants of investment should be considered as, for instance, present and expected consumption and export. Saturation of productive capacity represent a key references for firms' decisions to invest. Furthermore, new technology innovation and the need of imitating competitors' adoption of innovation can also force firms to invest.
Cumulated investments over time give rise to capital, opening the
path to improvements in production conditions. Production capacity,
potential productivity, cost effectiveness,
production and process quality will be all increased by properly-oriented
investment. Export competitiveness should
also rise. Employment
can fall if a labour substitution investment prevails with real output
growing less than physical productivity. By contrast, other kinds of investment
and economic situations give rise to an increasing employment. As a GDP component from the current domestic expenditure side, investment has an immediate impact on GDP. An increase of consumption rises GDP by the same amount, other things equal. Moreover, since income (GDP) is an important determinant of consumption, the increase of income will be followed by a rise in consumption: a positive feedback loop has been triggered (between consumption and income) by investment. Because of this mechanism, imports will grow as well. More directly, investment is often directed to foreign machineries and goods, with an immediate increase of imports.
Countries differ a lot in respect to investment levels and dynamics. Some
countries have heavily invested, sacrificing current consumption and triggering
an export-led growth, often based
on manufacturing. Others keep investment at much lower levels with an
unsecure growth path. Business
cycle behaviour During the recovery,
investment grow at a much faster pace than consumption or GDP, usually
irrespective of interest rate movements. On the contrary, the
influence of interest rates on investment can be important at turning
points. At peaks, consistent increase of the interest rate would drastically
worsen the costs of existing loans for past investment. Disappointment
from demand grow may combine with this effect to reduce investment dynamics. Investment often peaks earlier than GDP, triggering a negative income-consumption multiplier, thus prompting a new recessionary direction. At trough, low interest
rates may be one of the very few good news for firms. Thus, combined with
positive expectations, investment may start growing from the very low
level at which they were. Positive expectations toward the economy may also bring leading firms to invest earlier than the trough. In so doing they may even invert the business cycle. On the other hand, investment in machinery may instead follow the lower trough, since the first recovery may simple use the existing, not-fully exploited capital. Needless to say, business cycles have many sources and paths, thus wide discrepancies with the previously presented scenario can arise. Investment
data from 136 countries: a long term time series Formal
models Investment in electricity generation and its determinants Estimation of a dynamic discrete choice model of irreversible investment High-Tech Start-Ups and Industry Dynamics in Silicon Valley The economics of ex ante coordination Do R&D investments affect export performance? The Role of Financial Market Imperfections and Uncertainty in Investment of Rice Mills in Vietnam
|
||